Running tally — equilibrium frequency vs. dominance
What you just did has a name
The general mutation–selection balance for a deleterious allele in a
diploid population is:
q̂ ≈ (−hs + √((hs)² + 4μs)) / (2s).
Two limiting cases cover most biology:
- When h = 0 (fully recessive),
q̂ = √(μ/s). The carrier frequency2q̂can reach 0.5–1%. - When hs ≫ √(μs), the allele is exposed in
heterozygotes and
q̂ = μ/(hs). Selection sees heterozygotes; the allele is hammered out.
Rounds 1 and 2 differed only in h (0 vs. 0.5) — and the equilibrium frequency changed by a factor of 158. Round 4 sat near the crossover h ≈ √(μ/s), where the two approximations give different answers; the exact formula is required.
Round 5 was cystic fibrosis: predicted q̂ ≈ 0.0014 from mutation–selection balance, observed q ≈ 0.02 — an order of magnitude higher than the balance equation predicts. The discrepancy is real. Proposed explanations include heterozygote advantage (CF carriers may have been resistant to cholera or typhoid), lower effective s in historical populations, founder effects, and population-specific mutation rate. This is a genuine open question. When a balance equation fails by 10×, the biology is more complicated than the equation.